Previous Page  9 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

™

cce£t aiƒu

N°165

pose-built housing for the increasing num-

ber of students at ath’s tÜo excellent uni-

versities. The programme has regenerated

run-doÜn areas and brought revenue to

the shops, all goodÆ but it has also made

property unavailable for the home marŽet

and social housing.

7hile many changes are good, some are

fiercely resented: Residents don’t Üant the

cobbled streets, Regency shop fronts and

Palladian architecture to be ruined Üith

modern development. Many of the street

„improvement“ schemes carried out du-

ring the näs and ™äs Üere expensive and

totally inappropriate, but Üere bulldozed

through by trendy officials lacŽing histori-

cal understandingÆ there Üas even a mo-

ment Ühen our Üorld heritage status Üas

under threat. TÜo more recent decisions

Üere particularly controversial. The first

Üas the Christmas MarŽet. For almost

three ÜeeŽs, just Ühen locals are readying

themselves for the festive rush, dozens of

Üooden sheds croÜd the central areasÆ re-

sidents¼ parŽing spaces disappear and

coaches line access roads, causing blocŽa-

ges. 7e hate it, but it’s very successful so

Üill doubtless expand further! The second

decision Üas to build a casino. This city

made its fortune from gambling in the dis-

tant past, but proposals to build a modern

casino opposite the famous Theatre Royal

caused considerable concern. Our city is

home to dozens of street people as Üell as

the hundreds of youngsters studying hereÆ

maŽing a profit from Ühat can become an

expensive addiction maŽes for a bad

image and conflicts Üith government pro-

posals to limit gambling. 7e protested,

uselessly, so must live Üith it.

The latest outcry concerns the £Èth centu-

ry Abbey. This historic building, lying in

the heart of the old city, is the focal point

for us all. 7hen it Üas completed, the na-

ve Üas an empty spaceÆ the nobility had

stools, the populace Žnelt at stone ben-

ches around the Üalls. Then the Victorian

architect, Sir ilbert Scott, enhanced the

church Üith chandeliers and beautifully

carved peÜs, Ühich residents have prized

since £nÈä. oÜever, the Abbey noÜ re-

quires serious restoration. Due to the £x3™

dissolution of the monasteries, all the

smaller churches Üere demolished, so bu-

rials tooŽ place under the Abbey’s flag-

stones. The bodies have since decomposed

causing the floor to subside. Repairs are

underÜay, but Üith smaller congregations

and insufficient donations, funds are ur-

gently needed. The Abbey’s best option is

commercial development. y opening a

café, visitor facilities and education centre,

all heated using the thermal Üater, they

Üill attract more revenue... but first they

must remove the peÜs. The Victorian So-

ciety is outraged and protested furiously,

so the case for and against Üas put to the

Diocesan councilÆ the Abbey Üon, but the

determined Victorians intend to appeal.

ehind this quandary, hoÜever, lies anot-

her. The huge support church commissio-

ners are providing for the Abbey Üould fi-

nance badly-needed repairs to six old

churches around the country. Nothing is

simple Ühen it comes to heritage.

Change can be hard to live Üith but even

die-hards liŽe me accept its necessity. All

Üe asŽ is that it doesn’t destroy Ühat sur-

vived the £™4Ó litz and the council’s de-

termination to continue that destruction.

Only concerted efforts by men liŽe the po-

et ohn etjeman, and even Prince

Charles, a champion of architectural inte-

grity, helped locals stop Ühat became

ŽnoÜn as the „SacŽ of ath.“ The glorio-

us, pale stone buildings of visionary archi-

tects gleaming in the evening sunÆ the

quaint bacŽ streets and period shop-fronts

are special. A Üorld heritage site is not

just for us, it’s for future generations to en-

joy and learn from. ath is unique and in

a Üorld constantly changing, nothing

should change that.