Previous Page  6 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

\\e£t aigu

S. Ø

The invasion is one of ghosts, or a type of

gas, perhaps escaping from the corroding

hull of the crashed spaceship, turning town

residents, first, into a „species of blan-

kness“d - itself reminiscent of Ödön von

Horvath½s description, in

ugend "hne

Gott

1937®, of a „Zeitalter der Fische“ -

and finally, at the end of their process of

„becoming“, into transparent, tentacular

beings, communicating with each other

speechlessly, networked, as they are, into a

hive mind. Never mind, for now, that

King½s Gothic is defined by a monstrous fe-

mininity - the book is, in many ways, about

abject, rampant fertility or over-producti-

on, which itself also relates to writing, a

common concern in his work - because

what brought it to mind in recent weeks

was its setting in a series of unbreathable

spaces.

Haven lies as if under a dome, and on the

day Hilly makes his kid brother David dis-

appear, it is hot, humidÆ his audience sits

there, sun-stunned, before leaving early,

uncaring. It is, however, Altair-4, the place

where David disappears to, that I½ve never

forgotten in the years since I first read the

book - I initially kept re-reading the same

one, IT 1986®, almost compulsively - and

which keeps suggesting itself now, though

it has done so intermittently since the sum-

mer: storage planet, its name taken from

the 1956 film Forbidden Planet, King des-

cribes it as a dead world, grey, weird, inimi-

cal, and almost totally airless. To only have

felt the hostility of my surroundings recent-

ly itself smacks of privilege: politics as life

surrounded, with reference to Stefano Har-

ney and Fred Moten½s The Undercommons

2013®, politics as attack on the commons,

politics as toxic to socialityÆ that, I½ve

known all along, without - and still not -

being exposed nakedly, to its work of de-

ath.

Harney and Moten talk about airlessness,

too, the „dirty thinness of this atmosphere“

in which it½d be „evil and uncool to have a

place in the sun“Æ theirs is an understan-

ding of all politics everywhere as exclusion

and „anti-politically romantic“, they write

that their work is not about repair but

about effecting a breakage with the world

of walls, the world of objects, where there

are only relations between things, because

the social has congealed: it is commodities,

as Marx writes, that are citizens in this

worldÆ they are the forms that keep cycling

on, while living forms reify. Anti-politics,

so Harney and Moten, is the desire to be in

that break, as space of possibilities, and,

from there, to not know what is to come, or

where to go, because desire, afterwards,

will, must, be different. Politics, then, as

being made to disappear to Altair-4, or as

the process by which to turn the whole

world, here, into Altair-4, and to therefore

refuse it, to refuse, even, wholly, that there

might be a place in the sun, when all that

we should be able to see, if we kept our eyes

peeled, would be the death-patterns traced

on bodies no longer occluded, but returned

to us.

King½s book ends with David, warm and

solid, returned to Hilly, who himself wakes

from a coma: most of the rest of the town is

either dead or has been captured by the go-

vernment, are interned in camps, environ-

ment-controlled, where they½ll die: politics

surrounded, still. King½s ending, brothers

reunited, might be sentimental, but I won-

der whether we can nonetheless depart

from its obvious sentimentality and norma-

tivity in order to think about the restoration

of a living intimacy formed to the body of

the detainee, to the body of the other. As

such, the situation at the end of King½s no-

vel q whose limitations vis-D-vis otherness,

of which femininity is one, are very clear -

functions purely as a vehicle to think about

love, for abandoned bodies, for those nega-

ted here, those that disappear here, on Al-

tair-4. The book itself, after all, served lar-

gely as a starting point to think about atmo-

spheric conditions, about what Michel

Foucault calls biopolitics, the right to „ma-

ke live and let die“, forming the basic mo-

dus operandi of the modern state, about

the impossibility to breathe, about gagging

on the rhetoric that½s flung at us, about the

desire to be in the world, but the inability to

simply, justly, live in this one, and so to set

about realizing another one.

˜Ýaiώ

aRe££e o˜˜g£o£

Re|˜e\tio£s o£Ùagai£st tŒe .rese£t

£ 1te·Œe£ i£gÌs 3Œe 3ožžð—no\—eÏs

¹¯¤ttºc a £oíe˜ aRout a£ a˜ie£ i£íasio£

o\\urri£g i£ aíe£c \e£tra˜ !ai£ec i˜˜ð

roî£c ¯ö ðears o˜fc ·er|orms a magi\

tri\— îitŒ a riggef —itc tŒe ifea |or

îŒi\Œ \ame to Œim out o| tŒi£c sti˜˜ air½

Photo: o·yright: FaQienne ollignon